Skip to Content
Award recommendations for the Doctorate are made by the examination committee, comprising the examiners together with a neutral convenor appointed by the GRS. Examiners each write an independent report on the thesis; once these have been returned they are circulated confidentially amongst the examination committee, and it is only at this point that the examiners know each other's identities. Equally the candidate is only aware of the examiners' identities once the oral examination has been organised. The candidate's oral examination (also called a viva voce), is facilitated by the convenor. During the oral, the candidate defends the thesis in front of two examiners, usually the NZ and internal examiners. The third examiner, usually the overseas examiner, does not normally participate in the oral directly unless there is a wide discrepancy among examiners reports, but may have submitted questions in writing for the other examiners to raise at the oral. Supervisors act in a supportive but not participatory role during the oral examination. They should assist the student post-exam in accordance with the outcome of the oral. Logistical arrangements for the oral are administered centrally by the Graduate School, working together with the convenor, and not by the candidate's host academic unit.
Examination in the creative arts have some specific reporting requirements, detailed in the Guidelines for Examiners of Doctoral Thesis involving Creative Works. The examination process varies according to the form the creative component embodies. The candidate holds an exhibition/installation/performance after the exegesis has been received by the examiners. The examiners write a thesis assessment report examining both the exegesis, and exhibition/installation/performance, and finally attend an oral examination.
Page authorised by Web Content Manager
Last updated on Monday 25 September 2017